the high wall of
a national frontrer were placed between
Hong Kong
While I agree with Mr. Rogers' conclusion that
no useful negotiations with China (i.e. the present
Government at Hankow) could be expected until there is
a settlement of the present hostilities, I am more
inclined than he to believe in the real difficulties
which Hong Kong would face if the New Territories
BEDAKAVEDA, and the virtual impossibi-
lity of maintaining and administering the Colony on
anything like the present lines without the New
Territorieshmaning economically in close limeson with
The present "ease" of the New Territories
does not expire for another 60 years. It was obtained
from China in 1898 for the reason given in the Agreement of that year, viz. because this extension of Hong Kong
territory was necessary for the proper defence and
protection of the Colony. What we had in mind at that
time was no doubt a defensive frontier against a Chinese
enemy. The area was then a largely uninhabited area of
a ridge of mountains with foothills on either side.
This same area, as has been repeatedly explained in past
memoranda, and as the Governor explains again in his
present despatch, has now been invaded by the buildings
and streets of the modern city of Kowloon, by the
extension of the docks and other port activities, by
the building of a great aerodrome for the use both of the
R.A.F. and for international air lines, and finally by the construction of the Shing Mun Valley water reservoir (one of the most considerable water engineering feats
in the Colonial Empire), with its accompanying pipelines
down into Kowloon and across the harbour to the island.
All this shows how the circumstances nave
changed since 40 years ago when we considered it necessary
to obtain possession of the New Territories for defence purposes, and whatever the need then, it is certainly
greater
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.